Five questions to address Canada's turning point for energy and natural resources

Ad blocking detected

Thank you for visiting We have detected you cannot see ads being served on our site due to blocking. Unfortunately, due to the high cost of data, we cannot serve the requested page without the accompanied ads.

If you have installed ad-blocking software, please disable it (sometimes a complete uninstall is necessary). Private browsing Firefox users should be able to disable tracking protection while visiting our website. Visit Mozilla support for more information. If you do not believe you have any ad-blocking software on your browser, you may want to try another browser, computer or internet service provider. Alternatively, you may consider the following if you want an ad-free experience.

Canadian Insider Ultra Club
$500/ year*
Daily Morning INK newsletter
+3 months archive
Canadian Market INK weekly newsletter
+3 months archive
30 publication downloads per month from the PDF store
Top 20 Gold, Top 30 Energy, Top 40 Stock downloads from the PDF store
All benefits of basic registration
No 3rd party display ads

* Price is subject to applicable taxes.

Paid subscriptions and memberships are auto-renewing unless cancelled (easily done via the Account Settings Membership Status page after logging in). Once cancelled, a subscription or membership will terminate at the end of the current term.

Five questions to address Canada's turning point for energy and natural resources

Canada NewsWire

Building energy security abroad while leading the energy transition at home

  • Canada can take a leadership role to support global energy security
  • Decarbonization and enhanced energy security need not be mutually exclusive
  • Fostering east-west and north-south interconnections in North America would improve the energy mix and reduce the need for imports

CALGARY, AB, June 27, 2022 /CNW/ - In the midst of an increasingly volatile geopolitical environment, Canada has a unique opportunity to foster energy security abroad while leading the energy transition at home. These priorities are not mutually exclusive. Rather, Canadian stakeholders can — and should — focus on decarbonization while also working to solve today's urgent global oil and gas demand challenges.

Why? The human toll of the war in Ukraine is paramount. Yet, even as countries, including Canada, rally to provide humanitarian aid, impose sanctions and shelter millions of refugees, this crisis is already creating lasting economic impacts. From slowing growth to financial market disruption, heightened cyber risk to trade barriers, food insecurity to inflation: the list is long. And those ripple effects are increasingly pronounced across energy and commodity access and pricing:

  • In Europe, nearly 40% of natural gas and 25% of oil originates in Russia.
  • The US imports 35% of its palladium, which is used in fuel cells, from Russia.
  • Countries like Turkey, the Netherlands, Hungary, Kazakhstan and Poland also draw significant resources from Russian pipelines.
  • The United States banned Russian oil, gas and coal this spring and the United Kingdom announced a phase-out of Russian oil by the end of 2022. Up until now, these nations were heavy importers as well.
  • To be clear, any fall in the energy supply could shake up everything from industrial production capabilities to consumer energy bills well beyond Germany, Italy and Belarus, which import the most Russian oil.

Taken together, the international nature of vast reliance on Russian energy and natural resources means it could take until 2028 to stabilize the situation and an additional 20 years to get the sector back to a pre-war status quo. Enter the opportunity for Canada to build on broader aid commitments by embracing a different leadership role — one that cultivates greater energy security for more countries, all while redefining what the domestic energy sector can be from here on out.

How could that take shape? As a country that produced 5.1 million barrels of crude oil daily in 2020, Canada is fourth in the world in terms of production. At the same time, Canada ranks third in terms of oil reserves. What's more, as of 2017, this country held 77 trillion cubic feet (TcF) of proven gas reserves, representing about 1% of all natural gas reserves on the planet. That's equivalent to 17.5 times Canada's annual natural gas consumption. This means a whole lot of capacity in a market where the US is actively pursuing new import possibilities with Venezuela and Iran, and the UK is pushing OPEC to increase production. The fact that World Bank Governance Indicators and the Yale Environmental Performance Index rank Canada as the world leader among oil-producing countries on environmental, social and governance (ESG) standards makes this country an even more attractive and viable source of oil and gas imports.

But time is of the essence. Embracing this direction requires stakeholders — from energy company leadership right through to parliamentary policymakers — to consider critical questions now and align around a path forward quickly:

  1. Does Canada have the political and economic will to consider the long-term energy security we can provide to Europe and the US and the ability to get mega projects done?

    With 179 billion barrels of oil in reserve, Canada has a lot to offer right now. Even within Canada, energy independence is becoming increasingly top of mind. Some 52% of Québeckers think their province should develop its own oil resources instead of importing the oil consumed locally. That's up 9% from just one year ago. Let's dare to ask how we can play a global and national leadership role by broaching growing resource gaps with made-in-Canada energy security solutions. Many observers will say Canada's inability to build facilities and pipelines caused this country to miss the boat on liquified natural gas. Without clear consensus, similar obstacles could affect future plans.

  2. How will OPEC's response to calls for increased production impact prices and inflationary pressures here and everywhere?

    The Bank of Canada is already focused on rising inflation. Time and time again, historical oil price surges precede recessions. Even as Saudi Arabia announces investments to increase production, the train of economic impacts has clearly left the station. Counteracting these ripple effects through homegrown solutions can create new ways of evolving in the face of rising costs across the board.

  3. What does today's geopolitical crisis mean for the energy transition, and will it accelerate as a consequence of the reliance on Russian energy sources?

    The energy transition represents bold ambitions that will take shape over time. Before recent sanctions, Canada imported roughly $550 million worth of Russian crude annually. Seizing this tumultuous moment to let go of the reliance on foreign hydrocarbons and think more broadly about new energy supply sources like hydrogen, can help countries like Canada speed up the move toward a clean energy future. Exploring these opportunities can be an essential springboard to reinventing any nation's energy strategy.

  4. Where should the Canadian oil and gas sector's cash go next, given that large mega projects remain on the backburner?

    The cost of producing oil is dramatically lower in Canada than 10 years ago. Players can afford to shift away from paying down debt, increased dividends and buying back shares to focus on transforming decarbonization across the value chain. Whether through new engineering solutions like carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS), business models, reduced flaring, electrification or expansions into alternative energy sources like solar, wind or hydrogen capabilities: there are endless ways to abandon the same old, same old and evolve in compelling ways.

    Even in the face of surging prices, producers may remain understandably wary of spending aggressively to grow oil production after the pain of the 2020s pandemic-induced oil price collapse. Investors today demand strict capital discipline, while environmental opposition to new fossil fuel projects and the Canadian Government's plans to cap carbon emissions also deter growth. With that in mind, pairing performance improvement and portfolio investment opportunities through an integrated approach can open up a more successful transformation path than focusing on either priority in isolation.

    It's time to redefine what energy and natural resource companies do, and how. Visionary approaches can help organizations do that successfully while achieving both speed and scale.

  5. Can ongoing geopolitical uncertainty elevate the energy agenda in Canada and facilitate greater integration between critical energy infrastructure in North America? 

There isn't just one correct answer to North America's energy infrastructure challenges. There are many, each waiting to be discovered, discussed and developed. Pipeline pathways or electric grids. Crude or gas. Wind, solar or hydrogen. We know utilities can enable change if net-zero opportunities are captured and supported. We see the possibilities for governments to support energy security and transition through cross-industry and cross-sector support. Still, political agendas and a lack of interprovincial coordination remain prevalent challenges. The last few months have highlighted the need for a more connected approach to energy from east to west and north to south. Renewing those conversations through a forward-looking narrative is essential.

Where do we go from here?

We're now witnessing a fundamental shift in the energy world, with security becoming the dominant focus in the energy trilemma of security, sustainability and affordability. As Pulitzer Prize-winning author Daniel Yergin wrote several years ago and it's still true today, "…the starting point for energy security is diversification of supplies – that is, production coming from many sources." Energy security will be one of the significant critical challenges of foreign policy for Canada and the world in the years ahead.

Canada has long been known as a proactive peacemaker and an active proponent for conflict resolution. Today, we can build on that role to help solve the broader challenges that war and conflict like the crisis in Ukraine can trigger. Retrenching around decarbonization while supporting allies in Europe and beyond is possible. What's more, prioritizing both in equal measure could redefine the future of oil and gas once and for all. If we don't address this now, then when?

By Lance Mortlock, EY Canada Energy Leader, and Terry McKay, EY Canada Oil & Gas Leader.

About EY

EY exists to build a better working world, helping create long-term value for clients, people and society and build trust in the capital markets. Enabled by data and technology, diverse EY teams in over 150 countries provide trust through assurance and help clients grow, transform and operate. Working across assurance, consulting, law, strategy, tax and transactions, EY teams ask better questions to find new answers for the complex issues facing our world today.

EY refers to the global organization, and may refer to one or more, of the member firms of Ernst & Young Global Limited, each of which is a separate legal entity. Ernst & Young Global Limited, a UK company limited by guarantee, does not provide services to clients. Information about how EY collects and uses personal data and a description of the rights individuals have under data protection legislation are available via EY member firms do not practice law where prohibited by local laws. For more information about our organization, please visit  Follow us on Twitter @EYCanada.

This news release has been issued by Ernst & Young LLP.

SOURCE EY (Ernst & Young)

Cision View original content to download multimedia:

Copyright CNW Group 2022

Comment On!

Upload limit is up to 1mb only
To post messages to your Socail Media account, you must first give authorization from the websites. Select the platform you wish to connect your account to (via Easy Blurb).