Thank you for visiting CanadianInsider.com. We have detected you cannot see ads being served on our site due to blocking. Unfortunately, due to the high cost of data, we cannot serve the requested page without the accompanied ads.
If you have installed ad-blocking software, please disable it (sometimes a complete uninstall is necessary). Private browsing Firefox users should be able to disable tracking protection while visiting our website. Visit Mozilla support for more information. If you do not believe you have any ad-blocking software on your browser, you may want to try another browser, computer or internet service provider. Alternatively, you may consider the following if you want an ad-free experience.
* Price is subject to applicable taxes.
Paid subscriptions and memberships are auto-renewing unless cancelled (easily done via the Account Settings Membership Status page after logging in). Once cancelled, a subscription or membership will terminate at the end of the current term.
The Fed is no doubt aware of these concerns by now. Insiders seem to be betting that the Fed will at least provide some policy certainty so that investors can plan accordingly. That alone may help to stabilize stocks over the next year. One way or the other, the Fed is going to have to get off the fence and signal what is more important: getting to 2% inflation or deflating asset bubbles. How stocks respond will likely depend on the path that the Fed chooses. While Canada has rolled the dice by risking a real estate bubble (see oil patch for a post-bubble scenario), due to tightening financial conditions America faces a deflationary scare as seen in collapsing inflation expectations. Consequently, the Fed has no easy choices at this point based on its current thinking. For example, Minneapolis Fed President Narayana Kocherlakota has noted that raising rates risks diminishing the Fed's inflation targeting credibility. On the other hand, even the Fed knows that keeping rates at zero risks promoting more asset bubbles.
We see at least a 50% likelihood that the Fed will choose in favour of risking more bubbles. Indeed, in a speech last week, San Francisco Fed President John C. Williams made the case that it is too expensive to pop housing bubbles given the assumed negative impact on growth. If we are wrong and the Fed does move ahead with a rate hike this year, it will need to provide a new narrative as to why this is consistent with its inflation objective.
jordan Sneakers | Air Jordan 1 Retro High OG 'University Blue' — Ietp
We use cookies to tailor your experience, measure site performance and present relevant offers and advertisements. By clicking ‘Accept’ or any content on this site, you agree that cookies can be placed on your browser. You can view our privacy policy to learn more.
If you want a better viewing and privacy experience, join us as Canadian Insider Club Ultra member to eliminate third-party ads